JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 2, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Leon Jaime Echavarria M.

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-180A/17.

El memorialista le pidió a la Corporación señalar si el fallo de la referencia tiene efectos inter comunis.

La Sala de Revisión estableció que el peticionario no cuenta con legitimación para lograr lo pretendido, en tanto no participó en el proceso de tutela como parte ni como tercero con interés directo.

Con base en lo anterior, dispuso RECHAZAR DE PLANO la aclaración invocada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR DE PLANO, la solicitud de aclaración presentada por el señor León Jaime Echavarría, por falta de legitimación para actuar.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaría General NOTIFÍQUESE el presente auto al señor León Jaime Echavarría, y REMÍTASE copia al Juzgado
  3. Sexto. Municipal de Pequeñas Causas Laborales de Medellín.
  4. TERCERO. Contra este auto no cabe recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.